Delay of the Bela Act clauses misguided

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s recent announcement that he is still awaiting the outcome of deliberations on Clauses 4 and 5 of the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act (Bela), before implementation can go ahead, is both disappointing and misguided. Picture: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s recent announcement that he is still awaiting the outcome of deliberations on Clauses 4 and 5 of the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act (Bela), before implementation can go ahead, is both disappointing and misguided. Picture: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers

Published Dec 3, 2024

Share

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s recent announcement that he is still awaiting the outcome of deliberations on Clauses 4 and 5 of the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act (Bela), before implementation can go ahead, is both disappointing and misguided.

It raises significant concerns about Ramaphosa’s leadership and his commitment to inclusivity in South Africa’s education system.

When Bela was made law, it came with an initial three-month delay for these two clauses, which grant greater control to the department over school admission policies and compelling school governing bodies to submit their language policies for approval by the provincial head of department. Ramaphosa’s hesitation over their implementation suggests a lack of commitment to fostering an integrated education system.

This delay is not merely a procedural hiccup; it is a significant setback in South Africa’s long journey towards dismantling the remnants of apartheid-era segregation, particularly in our schools. It allows organisations like Solidarity and the DA to perpetuate racist and exclusionary ideologies under the guise of “protecting” their interests.

These entities, steeped in the apartheid mindset, are rallying against inevitable progress, arguing from a platform of fear and self-interest.

Supporting inclusive education means advocating for equal access and opportunities for all children, irrespective of race, language, or background.

This is a call to action for all South Africans: it’s time to not just embrace the ideals of a united nation but to work to translate those ideals into reality through faith in legislation like the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act.

Delaying these clauses sends a message that the status quo, steeped in discrimination, is acceptable. Ramaphosa must rectify this swiftly.

It is not just about legislation; it is about our collective responsibility to future generations. Only by holding steadfast to the principles of inclusivity and equality can we hope to cultivate an education system that reflects the diverse tapestry of our society.

THE MERCURY